Sweet taste preference as a moderator of links between internalizing symptoms and alcohol craving.

OBJECTIVE: Strong positive links exist between mood, alcohol craving, and sweet taste preference. Research suggests a substitution effect of alcohol with sweets. During alcohol abstinence, individuals have increased craving for alcohol and sweets, in association with anxiety and depression symptoms. Thus, the present study examined the moderating role of sweet taste preference on links between anxiety and depression symptoms and alcohol craving. METHOD: Participants were individuals (N = 91) with alcohol use disorder (AUD) enrolled in a partial hospitalization program. Participants completed baseline assessments of anxiety and depression symptoms, alcohol use and craving, and sweet taste preference. RESULTS: We found significant correlations between symptoms of depression, anxiety, alcohol craving, and sweet taste preference. Sweet taste preference moderated links between both depression and anxiety symptoms with alcohol craving. CONCLUSIONS: For those low and moderate in sweet taste preference, internalizing symptoms appeared positively linked with alcohol craving. For those high in sweet taste preference, alcohol craving remained elevated regardless of anxiety symptoms, but appeared to decrease with heightened depressive symptoms. Should future research replicate this finding using controlled research designs that demonstrate temporality and causality, tailored early AUD interventions may be justified based on individuals' levels of sweet taste preference.

Randomized Controlled Trial of Aerobic Exercise for Smoking Cessation among Individuals with Elevated Depressive Symptoms.

INTRODUCTION: Adults with depression have higher rates of cigarette smoking and are more likely to relapse than those without depression. Pharmacological, psychological, and combined interventions have largely yielded small improvements in smoking outcomes for adults with depression. Aerobic exercise (AE) may facilitate smoking cessation in this subpopulation. METHODS: This study was a 12-week two-arm randomized controlled trial that evaluated the effect of a moderate-intensity AE program compared to a health education contact (HEC) control on smoking cessation in adults with elevated depressive symptoms (mild to severe). Participants (n=231) were randomized to AE or HEC and received smoking cessation treatment (telephone counseling and nicotine replacement therapy). Primary (biologically confirmed 7-day point prevalence abstinence) and secondary (depressive symptoms, objective and self-reported physical activity, and cardiorespiratory fitness) outcomes were assessed at baseline, 3-, 6-, and 12-months. Data were analyzed with mixed-effects generalized linear models controlling for age, gender, nicotine dependence, history of major depression disorder, and month of follow-up assessment. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in primary or secondary outcomes between the AE and HEC groups. CONCLUSIONS: The AE program was not superior to HEC in facilitating smoking cessation, increases in physical activity, or improved depressive symptoms. Given evidence for the positive acute effects of exercise on mood and smoking urges, future research should consider testing alternative exercise approaches for aiding smoking cessation beyond structured, aerobic exercise programs. IMPLICATIONS: This study found that an adjunctive aerobic exercise (AE) program was not superior to a health education contact control for adults with elevated depressive symptoms, all of whom also received standard smoking cessation treatment. This finding adds to the growing body of literature that structured aerobic exercise programs for smoking cessation may have limited efficacy for cessation outcomes. Future research is needed to test alternative methods of integrating AE into smoking cessation treatment, such as strategically using exercise to manage cravings and low mood in the moment.

An update on the pilot trial of consumer-directed care for older persons in Australia.

The Australian Government has commenced a two-year pilot of consumer-directed care (CDC) across 500 home and community aged care packages. This policy paper discusses the model being trialled in Australia in light of the UK's Individual Budgets' Pilot Programme and the USA's Cash and Counselling Demonstration. The results of these randomised controlled studies suggest that older people vary in their preferences for consumer direction and that many find the administrative tasks of implementing CDC programs difficult. The relatively restricted model of CDC that the Australian Government is trialling may minimise the problems encountered in the overseas programs, but does not allow consumers to hire family or friends which they preferred to do overseas.